Dental Material Comparison Tool | Zirconia vs E.max โ€” Colorado Lab
๐Ÿ‚Fall
๐Ÿ‚
๐Ÿ
๐ŸŒพ
๐Ÿ‚
๐Ÿ
๐ŸŒพ
๐Ÿ‚
๐Ÿ
๐ŸŒพ
๐Ÿ‚
๐Ÿ
๐ŸŒพ
Comparison Tool

Compare Materials
Side by Side

Select up to 3 materials to compare strength, translucency, and cost with animated visual bars. Make informed decisions for every case.

Select Materials (2/3)

Full-Contour Zirconia

Posterior Zone ยท Excellent wear resistance

Flexural Strength
800 MPa
Translucency
25%
Cost Level
$$

e.max (Lithium Disilicate)

Anterior Zone ยท Good wear resistance

Flexural Strength
400 MPa
Translucency
65%
Cost Level
$$$
Full-Contour Zirconia

Advantages

  • +Highest strength available
  • +Ideal for bruxers
  • +Proven long-term durability

Limitations

  • โˆ’Lower translucency
  • โˆ’Not ideal for anterior esthetic zone
e.max (Lithium Disilicate)

Advantages

  • +Best-in-class esthetics
  • +Excellent translucency
  • +Proven bond strength

Limitations

  • โˆ’Lower fracture toughness
  • โˆ’Not for heavy posterior load
  • โˆ’Higher cost

Not Sure Which Material to Choose?

Send us your case files and our team will recommend the ideal material for your specific clinical situation.